The
evolutions in the energy sector is inevitable and much needed, with limited
non-renewable energy resources around, it becomes rather futile to question the
development this this sector. The researchers are looking forward to create
more resilient and dependable fuel as well as alternatives that could save us
energy. A bright idea in the same bid was the progression of: light bulbs that
use 75% to 80% less energy. Exhausting much lesser amount of energy as well as,
resulting in reduction of heat produced than its outdated substitutes.
Compact
fluorescent bulbs (CFL) and light-emitting diode bulbs (LED) are quickly
becoming the new norm. These newer bulbs have a bright future as they are made
with an aim of systematic reduction of inefficient incandescent bulbs.
The
spiral-shaped bulbs known as CFL has been an alternative to incandescent bulbs.
But the leading LED bulbs are most appreciated and longest lasting of them all.
It was
recently that many renowned companies announced new LED products into the
market, keeping the perspective of the
energy efficient and demand in preview these have announced LED replacement lamps (40W equiv) for less
than $10. This is a huge price inflection point that will help consumers adopt
the technology.
But what is that makes LED a better replacement of CFL's other than energy and indirectly capital saving?
Not many out there knows that Not only is the performance of CFL worse than LED lamps, they also contain mercury. Which is toxic in nature and could really be harmful. More explained in the infographic: